Table of Contents
Written by : Odis Stockon |
Current |
Write a comment |
Write a comment
here's a question from Cora can i trademark a generic word I'm Andre min from the founder of trademark Factory and this is my answer to this question it really depends yes you can trademark a generic word as long as you're not trying to trademark a generic word for the product or the service that this generic word signifies so for example Apple the phone company trademark one of the most generic words in the English language Apple but they were able to do this because they don't sell apples what they do has nothing to do with the fruit so that's why you could trademark a generic word as long as that generic word has nothing to do with your products and services but if they were trying to trademark the word Apple while trying to sell apples that would not have worked that would have been a generic trademark and generic trademarks cannot be registered because the whole point of trademarks is to let people tell your products and services apart from everybody else's so if the brand new came up with does not have the capacity of allowing the market to tell your products and services from everybody else's then you can't use that brand as a trademark that's why you can't have generic trademarks but for again just going back to Apple nobody would think that they're getting an Apple like a real Apple from the phone company or a computer company or software company and that's how they remember that Apple is Apple and not something else so when you're asking can you trademark generic words always clarify is it for the same thing as the word means or not now I hope this answers your question and if it does if you haven't subscribed yet well what are you waiting for you probably have more questions about trademarks and branding and entrepreneurship subscribe now and you're gonna find your answers here any if you want me to answer your question that I haven't answered before and I'll make sure you comment below and I'll shoot a video answer your question until then I'll see you in the next video
Thanks for your comment Anh Stetz, have a nice day.
- Odis Stockon, Staff Member
can you use a generic term plus.com as a trademark well the supreme court's just ruled on that and i'm going to talk about it over the next four minutes i'm angela langlotz trademark and copyright attorney and i go live here on weekdays to talk trademarks and copyrights so don't forget to smash the like button and subscribe if you'd like more of these videos in your feed so last week i believe it was the supremes ruled that it is perfectly okay to use a generic term plus a.com as a trademark now why why do we not allow generic terms as trademarks well remember that a trademark is a source identifier that means that when i look at that brand i know which company those goods or those services are coming from and trademarks should be distinctive they should identify a source and if you have a generic word like booking for travel booking services that is a generic term so we can't use that because it would prevent other people from fairly describing their goods right so they couldn't say i have a booking site right because then the people who had the booking trademark would get all upset and say well you're infringing our trademark because we have a trademark on booking for booking travel services so you can see why that doesn't work but if you add a dot-com on the end and the consumer sees that dot com the whole term dot com like booking.com as a source identifier meaning they know exactly what company is providing or offering those services now you can use it as a trademark it used to be that you you couldn't do that there was a split in the circuits one circuit said yes the patent and trademark office said no so the supreme court said well we're gonna decide and they decided they said look if the consumers view that as a source identifier then it is now a trademark remember trademarks are very consumer focused we want to make sure that consumers are not confused right that consumers understand the relationship between the trademark and the company that's offering the goods and services and that the trademark serves to distinguish those goods and services from other goods and services available in the marketplace so the supreme court said listen this is a this this trademark is booking.com there can only be one booking.com because there's only one dot-com domain available booking.com it is one source right so they reasoned to they said booking.com did a survey and consumers identified booking.com as a source for travel bookings so therefore booking.com can serve as a trademark so that's the new news under certain circumstances and you may have to prove by a survey that consumers view your.com as an actual trademark as an actual source identifier you may have to prove that with a survey but it is possible now the word is official to use a generic term plus a.com for a trademark for your goods or services i'm angela langlotz i'm a trademark and copyright attorney and i go live here again share this video if you think people might find it useful smash the like button and subscribe and you will see me every weekday here talking about trademarks and copyrights you can also find me online at trademarkdoctor.net drop any trademark or copyright questions you might have into the comments and i will answer them on a future live video
Thanks Robby your participation is very much appreciated
- Odis Stockon
About the author
I've studied behavioral neuroscience at Chamberlain University in Addison and I am an expert in historic preservation. I usually feel satisfied. My previous job was hotel manager I held this position for 15 years, I love talking about city trip and sunbathing. Huge fan of Ethan Suplee I practice golf and collect books and periodicals.
Try Not to laugh !
Joke resides here...