A trademark owner that successfully proves infringement [Expert-Advice]



Last updated : Sept 13, 2022
Written by : Lorrine Castilleja
Current current readers : 163
Write a comment

A trademark owner that successfully proves infringement

How do you prove trademark infringement?

To prevail on a claim of trademark infringement, a plaintiff must establish that it has a valid mark entitled to protection; and that the defendant used the same or a similar mark in commerce in connection with the sale or advertising of goods or services without the plaintiff's consent.

What is trademark infringement examples?

One common example of trademark infringement is where clothing manufacturers attach brand labels to generic items, attempting to have them “pass off” as authentic. Trademark infringement violations are very serious and are often involve aspects of deceptive trade practices.

What must a plaintiff prove in a successful trademark infringement case quizlet?

Under the Trademark Dilution Revision Act, a plaintiff must prove that the plaintiff owns a famous mark that is distinctive; the defendant has begun using a mark that is diluting the famous mark; the similarity between the defendant's mark and the famous mark gives rise to an association between the marks; and this is ...

Who is liable for trademark infringement?

If a manufacturer or distributer intentionally induces another to infringe a trademark, or if it continues to supply its product to one whom it knows or has reason to know is engaging in trademark infringement, the manufacturer or distributer is contributorially responsible for any harm done as a result of the deceit.

How do you respond to a trademark infringement letter?

(b) You may respond by requesting more specific evidence as to why the trademark owner believes you are infringing its mark, including exploring dates of first use, whether the mark is federally registered, and the geographic areas where the mark has been used.

What if someone is using my trademark?

If the person or entity receives your letter and continues to use your trademark, it's time to file a lawsuit. The suit will get filed in federal court if it spans more than one state. If the infringement is local, it may get filed in a state court.

What are some 5 examples of trademarks?

  • Under Armour®
  • Twitter®
  • It's finger lickin' good! ®
  • Just do it®
  • America runs on Dunkin'®

Is trademark infringement a crime?

Criminal Trademark Infringement — What Is It? Criminal trademark infringement is the unauthorized and illegal use of someone else's trademark to create confusion between the original and another mark. Businesses spend a great deal of time, energy, and money on the trademarks that represent their brand.

What is the punishment for trademark infringement?

The most common penalty for trademark infringement is an injunction or a cease and desist letter directing the infringer to stop using the trademarked material. It's also possible for criminal or civil penalties to result from an intentional violation of trademark law, although this is rare.

What must a plaintiff prove in a successful trademark infringement case Mcq?

What must a plaintiff prove in a successful trademark infringement case? Defendant infringed plaintiff's mark. Defendant used the mark in an unauthorized manner. The use of the mark is likely to cause confusion or deception of the public as to the origin of the services or goods.

What are the remedies for trademark infringement?

  • a court order (injunction) that the defendant stop using the accused mark;
  • an order requiring the destruction or forfeiture of infringing articles;

What are the 8 elements used to determine infringement of a trademark?

In determining the likelihood of confusion in trademark infringement actions the courts look to these eight factors: the similarity of the conflicting designations; the relatedness or proximity of the two companies' products or services; strength of the plaintiff's mark; marketing channels used; the degree of care ...

What happens if someone violates a trademark?

When infringement occurs, a trademark owner (the plaintiff) may file a lawsuit against the infringing user of the same or similar mark (the defendant) to prevent further use of the mark and collect money damages for the wrongful use.

What are damages for trademark infringement?

The Lanham Act provides for three categories of damages that the court may award to a successful trademark infringement Plaintiff: (1) Actual Damages, (2) Disgorgement of the Infringer's Profits, and (3) Attorney's Fees and Costs. Disgorgement of Profits.

Can you sue for trademark infringement without registration?

Section 27 of the act provides that no action for infringement can be taken for an unregistered trademark. But for a registered trademark, an action for infringement lies where the aggrieved can be sought civil and criminal reliefs. Moreover, section 28 of the act confers certain benefits on registration.

How serious is a cease and desist letter?

Even if the sender demands or “requires” action, cease and desist letters are not summons and complaints. The sender may threaten to file litigation if a response is not received, but the letter does not mean a lawsuit has been filed. Instead, the letter is a warning of sorts.

How do you write a cease and desist letter for a trademark infringement?

I, [Infringer's Name], personally, and on behalf of [infringing company, if any,] agree to immediately cease and desist from any and all further use of [registered trademark/domain].

What is the most famous trademark?

  • Amazon – 416 Billion Dollars.
  • Apple – 352 Billion Dollars.
  • Microsoft – 327 Billion Dollars.
  • Google – 324 Billion Dollars.
  • Visa – 187 Billion Dollars.
  • Alibaba – 153 Billion Dollars.
  • Tencent – 151 Billion Dollars.
  • Facebook – 147 Billion Dollars.

What is a famous trademark?

A famous or well-known mark is a trademark that, in view of its widespread reputation or recognition, may enjoy broader protection than an ordinary mark.

What are the 3 types of trademarks?

What you'll learn: Arbitrary and Fanciful Trademarks. Suggestive Trademarks. Descriptive Trademarks.


more content related articles
Check these related keywords for more interesting articles :
Trademark registration site
How to say patent in spanish
Can you trademark the name of a city
Trademark infringement in high court
How to patent in india
Where to trademark a business name
What is intellectual property sharing
How do you copyright a name for a business
How to open brands chicken essence
How to patent an idea for a website
How to write brand positioning statement
Trademark cross search list
Trademark registration office wadala
How to write a brand positioning
Intellectual property law houston








Did you find this article relevant to what you were looking for?


Write a comment




A trademark owner that successfully proves infringement


Comment by Stephenie Tredennick

here's a great question from Teddy Halil e our subscriber on YouTube the question is to what extent ownership of a registered trademark provides a defense to a claim for passing off that's a great great great question and I'll go in detail to explain what this actually means what the repercussions are but before I do that my name is Andre man cuff I've done hundreds of videos just like this one and I'm planning to do many many more so if you have an interest in learning more about trademarks about intellectual property about branding about what makes a brand great about entrepreneurship make sure you subscribe to get notified whenever the next video goes live if you've got a question for me that's really how I generate ideas for videos like this one make sure you post the comment below and I'll try to answer your question now to Teddy's question well to what extent does ownership of a registered trademark provide a defense to a claim for passing off you'll find out in just a moment alright first of all what is a claim for passing off though before there were laws statutes about trademarks and common-law countries like us like UK Canada there were common law rules that are common law common law rules for passing of that would allow owners of brands that you couldn't register as trademarks because there were no trademarks back then to still stop their direct competitors from stealing their brands and taking a free ride on the reputation of a good name so those were called passing off and the idea behind those laws was that you couldn't take your products and pass it off as the product of somebody else but you couldn't just slap a logo over your competitor and say hey buy buy this product so that everyone would think it's that famous brands behind it whereas it wasn't so that was called passing off and then they introduced statutory protection for trademarks right the trademark act in Canada Langham will act in the US but the idea was that in addition to common law protection for unregistered trademarks there there was now a possibility to register your trademark and secure your brand through registration and so when you register a trademark your trademark certificate provides you the presumption of ownership and validity it's a rebuttable presumption so here's what this means it means as unless somebody can prove otherwise the owner of a registered trademark is deemed to be the owner of a valid mark right so the two presumptions the first presumption is that the mark is a valid trademark unless again somebody can successfully rebut that presumption and also the second presumption is that the person whose name appears on the certificate of registration is the rightful owner of that valid trademark now if there is a case of passing off against the owner of a registered trademark it starts the same way as any other claim in passing off the owner of the unregistered brand first needs to show that they've got a brand that's the hardest part about unregistered trademarks because in common law countries yes you can do something with unregistered rings this is just freakin difficult and super expensive so first thing they need to do is establish that they've got a brand that requires surveys that requires expert evidence that requires documents you just have to show to the court that your brand is known to significant number of people for specific type of products or services that come from you so assuming you establish that that's the first thing you need to establish with a claim of passing off the second thing you need to establish is that the defendant the person or the company you're suing is offering similar products and services to yours under a similar brand in the same geographical area where your brand is known and they do it without your permission so if you can show all of that then that beats the presumption that the defendant would have with the with the trademark for nutrition as long as you have a private right but and as long as of their trademark is not an incontestable trademark and as long as there's and as long as you know they didn't register their trademark through fraud and as long as they didn't they didn't register their trademark knowing about you so there's a million things here the problem the problem with that is proving all of that requires a lot of resources so if you are a owner of a registered trademark is it a hundred-percent guarantee that there is no other firm out there that could sue you for passing off no but the risk of that is minimal because the idea is very simple if they didn't bother to trademark their brand when it was easy and inexpensive the risk of them finding fifty seventy hundred thousand dollars to go after you with their unregistered trademark with a claim for passing off is almost non-existent so could they do it maybe but very very very very unlikely that's why that's holy I do that's you got this whole idea of rebuttable presumption right that unless that presumption is rebutted by evidence by arguments that the court agrees with that presumption stands but it's not iron clad it could be it could be rebutted if they prove otherwise so that's that's that's how it works so if you got a registered trademark unless somebody goes after you and cancels that trade market because they can prove to the judge that the the trademark was registered improperly you're the owner you're the owner even if everyone understands that this trademark should not have been registered until that's actually formalized in you know any decision the owner of a trademark is the owner of a trademark so I hope this answers your question and make sure you like this video make sure you post a comment below if you have additional feedback or if you have a question for me that you want me to answer and we'll just go from there right and until then I'll see you in the next video in the next video I will see you off sure


Thanks for your comment Stephenie Tredennick, have a nice day.
- Lorrine Castilleja, Staff Member


Comment by kissaragiL

hello my name is um talo fear i'm a partner at decker and of fear law firm we provide intellectual property legal services and today i want to speak with you about uh trademark infringement um so there are a lot of uh trademark owners um that um that own a trademark but the headquarters of the company are not in israel and um the products are being um marketed by an importer or a distributor but the ip rights belong to the owner of the trademark which is who is i'm outside of israel and a lot of times the distributor or your importer advises the owner of the trademark that um that the trademark is being infringed by a third party and in that case the owner of the trademark is required to approach an israeli attorney and to find out how to go about it and this is the services that we offer so first of all what we do is make sure that the owner of the trademark has a registered trademark in israel and if not we act to file an application immediately the second stage is to inquire regarding the infringement whether it is an infringement um what can we do about it what we usually do as a first step is to send a c synthesis letter to try to exhaust all methods of avoiding litigation which can be prolonged and costly and if that does not work then we file a lawsuit against the infringer in the lawsuit we we note all the infringements and the infringer has 60 days to respond the the rest of the of the case in the in court um involves pre-trial evidence um summations all of these stages uh during which usually the parties reach some sort of agreement or compromise between them and then the matter is resolved and that is basically the infringement you can find more information about this topic in our articles at our website thank you for watching you


Thanks kissaragiL your participation is very much appreciated
- Lorrine Castilleja


About the author